In partnership with
Montana's new property tax structure took effect in 2026 — and short-term rental owners are now paying a flat 1.90% rate on full assessed value while primary residences pay half that. On a $500K property, that's $3,000 more per year. The deadline to qualify for the lower rate already passed. Here's what you need to know now.
MARKET INTEL
The tax change creates a clear two-tier system. Short-term rentals fall under commercial property classification and get hit with the 1.90% rate. Primary residences stay at 0.95% under homestead classification.
Run the numbers on your properties. A $500,000 STR now pays $9,500 annually in property tax. The same property as a primary residence pays $4,750. That $4,750 spread matters for cash flow models, especially in Montana's resort markets where values have climbed 40–60% since 2020.
The change affects all five states in our coverage area differently. Montana stands alone with this aggressive STR tax tier. Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, and Idaho maintain relatively neutral treatment between residential and commercial use properties — though local jurisdictions in Colorado resort towns have explored similar splits.
Operators running multiple properties need to recalculate breakeven occupancy rates. At $3,000–$5,000 in additional annual tax expense per unit, you need 3–5 extra occupied nights at $200/night average daily rate just to cover the new tax burden. That assumes no other cost increases.
OPERATOR PLAYBOOK
Review your property classifications with your county assessor immediately. Some operators may have been incorrectly classified or may qualify for different treatment based on usage patterns. The deadline to qualify for the lower homestead rate already passed for 2026. If you own a property that could serve as your primary residence, you needed to file before January 1. Mark your calendar for 2027 filing if you're considering a change.
Adjust your pricing models now. Add $8–$12 per night to your base rates to cover the new tax load across a 250-night booking calendar. Test the increase with dynamic pricing tools to see where resistance hits in your market.
Consider the disposition strategy. Properties with thin margins before this change may no longer pencil. Run a hold-versus-sell analysis using the new tax structure. Factor in that buyers will also face this 1.90% rate, which pressures valuations downward.
Build the tax increase into owner statements if you manage properties for clients. Third-party owners need to see this line item broken out separately with clear explanation. Expect questions about switching to long-term rentals, which would reclassify properties away from the commercial tier.
Long-term rental conversion does offer an exit from the 1.90% rate. A property rented on 12-month leases typically qualifies for residential treatment. You lose STR revenue upside but gain tax savings and regulatory simplicity. That trade makes sense for properties in your portfolio that underperform on occupancy or require excessive maintenance.
DEAL SPOTLIGHT
The Montana tax change creates a screening tool for acquisition targets. Look for distressed STR operators who haven't adjusted to the new tax reality. Properties that were breakeven at the old rate are now losing money. Owners who don't want to raise prices or can't fill enough nights will start looking for exits in Q2 and Q3.
Run every Montana deal with the 1.90% rate as a day-one expense. Don't use comps that reflect the old tax structure. Underwriting discipline matters more now that the expense side just grew by 5–10% for most operators.
The tax change also makes owner-occupy strategies more attractive. Buy a property, use it personally 100+ days per year while renting it 200 days, and fight for homestead classification. Legal gray area, but worth exploring with Montana tax counsel.
Reply with what you're seeing in your market. I read every response.
— Timberline Operator
The 10 Best Cheap Stocks to Buy Now
The market is expensive… historically expensive.
Most of the biggest stocks are already fully priced. Capital has crowded into the same mega-cap names — making true value harder and harder to find.
By early 2026, institutional money had stayed concentrated. Smaller companies had been overlooked. And beaten-down names had been left behind.
But here's the real question…
When the broader market is this expensive — which stocks are still cheap enough to offer real upside?
Our new report reveals 10 undervalued stocks trading under $10 per share — from companies too small for institutional money managers to touch… to out-of-favor names already working their way back.
If you're looking for real value in an overpriced market, start here.